Often when I begin a conversation about education
reform I start with the topic of discipline. Inevitably
the person with whom I am having this conversation
responds, "Yes and we need more of it - we must keep
the kids in line" and similar statements. My reply
is, "Our children need to become self disciplined and
responsible for their own behavior. This can not happen
if, for all of their formative years, they have lived in a
world of external discipline. They have to learn to handle
freedom in order to learn what it is to be a self
disciplined contributing member of our society." Our
schools must come to recognize this wrong which they are
imposing on our children for short term gain. When you
keep children in an externally controlled state, where the
teacher is the controller, the disciplinarian, for the
entire twelve year spectrum of the child’s basic
education the teenage graduate leaves with a serious
deficit.
This misconception of the function of discipline is one
of the root ills of our current educational system. Young
adults who have been subjected to externally imposed
discipline for all of their formative years have no idea
how to become responsible citizens in our free society. As
graduates they push beyond the limits of acceptable
behavior. They do not know how to fit into work or higher
education since, until now, they have had no experience in
self initiating. All of the decisions regarding education,
what to study and how deeply to explore a subject have
been met by the curriculum specialist. The interplay of
externally imposed discipline and cookie cutter
curriculum, where the child is excluded from the decision
process, yields a young adult who is diminished in his/her
ability to function as a contributing responsible citizen
or as a fully functioning college student. In comparison
those students who have had the freedom to choose, make
meaningful decisions during their school years, leave with
a firm sense of identity, and with a knowledge that their
responsible behavior will sit well where ever they choose
to engage themselves. While those attending college are
prepared with the self discipline to undertake the rigors
of academic study.
In researching this article I spent some time looking
through the Oxford English Dictionary (OED). I was
searching for what the OED had as a definition for
discipline and self discipline. All of the entries for
discipline had a negative tone. When I sought the entry
for self discipline it wasn’t there! I couldn’t
believe it, especially since I found over 25 entries for
other self prefaced words. The one that stood out in my
mind as most significant in its relevance to freedom,
responsibility and self image was self actualization. How
much room is there for a student to self actualize in the
traditional classroom? He/she just can not self actualize
in a setting where the teacher controls every aspect of
life. In contrast in a multiage classroom or in a Sudbury
Valley School there are multiple opportunities for a
student to begin to realize the potentials of self
actualization. Significantly there were a number of other
self prefaced words. Since we are not specialists in
enabling students to self actualize I thought you might be
interested in just reading the other self prefaced words
that appear to support the concept of self actualization.
They are, self directing, self improving, self
determination, self governed, self restraint, self
respect, self- reliance, self starter, and self
sufficient. How many of these concepts can be realized in
an externally disciplined classroom as contrasted with a
classroom where students experience greater and greater
freedom and responsibility for their own education???
I would suggest that life for students gains meaning as
one is given an opportunity to make, on a daily basis,
meaningful decisions regarding each small step of life’s
encounters. This requires giving students a great more
say, freedom of choice, in the day to day operation of the
classroom. As students become proficient in classrooms
whose management allows for increased freedom they also
learn how to become responsible and self disciplined and,
as you will see shortly, their self image and academic
achievement improves drastically. This does not happen
over night. Educators at all levels need training and
support. Teachers who have been applauded for their
control strategies must learn how to gradually yield some
of their control to the students. Administrators and
supervisors must participate in similar training in order
that they be able to provide support to their teachers as
they make this difficult transition. And the students need
to be trained to understand the new parameters under which
they are expected to work.
Ted Sizer of Brown University through his innovative
high school social studies program, Coalition of Essential
Schools, has met with a modest degree of success with this
retraining process.. But without continued support over
extended periods of time the system seems to revert back
to the teacher controlled, teacher disciplined classroom.
One video clip, of a female high school student who
participated in his program, supports the value of this
transfer of power from teacher to student. With a big
smile on her face she states, "Before this new
program I had difficulty writing a single page essay which
yielded a C, now I write a ten page paper and get an easy
A". Her smile and personal manor tells much about the
self confidence she has gained through her involvement in
Sizer’s social studies program.
The multiage classroom at the elementary school
provides many opportunities for students to learn about
self initiation, self discipline, responsibility with the
resulting change in self image.
The following e-mail, posted from a teacher to the
Multiage listserv, shows how self directed students can be
if they have had previous experience in sharing some of
the responsibilities of running a class.
I was out on a personal day yesterday and my sub
never showed up. My students had it all under control
and taught themselves for 45 minutes! Apparently, the
1st grade teacher went in to hear the announcements as
her intercom isn't working and she asked the kids
where their teacher was and they told her she never
came. She said they were all very attentive on the rug
doing calendar. She found an ed tech to cover my room
for the day! I talked to my kids about it today and I
asked them why they didn't tell the office, and they
said they knew what to do-they had even found my sub
plans and read the plans and were ready to go through
with the day. Two of the olders decided they were in
charge and everyone agreed to it. They even took the
lunch count slip to the office and never said a word!
I told them how proud I was of them, but in the
future, let someone know! I have seen some classes go
into their room and if the teacher isn't right there,
they panic!
Kim (mhayward@telplus.net)
This is the type of behavior one may expect when a
teacher shares responsibility with his students. The one
error here was that the ed tech who eventually became the
substitute intervened in the students self directed self
disciplined behavior. I imagine they would have been quite
successful in preceding though the day’s activities
without guidance. They in fact knew more of how their
particular class functioned than any substitute that could
have been brought in.
Opening the door to allow self discipline to develop
represents the single most important change that can be
introduced to our schools. We know very little about the
course of action yet in those settings where it has been
explored the resultant change in responsible behavior and
the level of self direction has been significant.
What follows is a quote from an e-mail that appeared on
the Multiage Listserv that demonstrates how students,
given freedom, are able to begin the self actualization
process.
I would like to address the issue of multiage and
self image, from my experiences working with classes
of 9-12 year olds for eight years in a multiage
atmosphere, and then watching them continue with their
education. Our students became very independent and
responsible, and felt very successful. It was very
obvious which students came to me from our primary
multiage classrooms, due to such things as their
independence and ability to make their own decisions,
work cooperatively, work until they completed a task,
seek help from other students, and not wait for me to
tell them every step to take. Many of them were also
working above grade level in one or more areas due to
the exposure to 4th and 5th grade work in the primary
centers.
When our intermediate students continued into
middle school, many of them were also working above
grade level, and the feedback from the middle school
teachers was the same. Even our students who tested
average and below average were very successful. They
accepted responsibility to complete assignments, made
decisions without waiting for the teacher to tell them
what to do, tended to put extra effort into projects,
etc. The teachers indicated they "knew how to
learn." None of our students ended upon their
"at risk" lists. We continue to see the
names of our students, including these "average
and below average" students on the honor rolls,
both in middle school and high school. (Janet Banks,
CATS Publications, Edmonds, WA)
Another model worth investigating is the Sudbury Valley
School in Framingham Massachusetts. This school, founded
in 1969, demonstrates the possibilities that exist when
you remove all of the controls we have in public education
and allow a child to use his/her innate inquiry skills to
initiate all of their learning experiences within a
community of inquirers. Even those students who make the
transition from traditional high schools soon learn to
reignite their innate inquiry skills and renew the
experience of having a love of learning. What a gift to
give a child who has fought the controls of traditional
education. The joy of self discovery is an empowering
force. We deny it to our masses. The success of this 32
year old program is documented in books, reports and
video’s. There are now over 20 clones of this model
throughout the US and several other countries around the
world. There is a value to look at this extreme model as
we consider providing freedom to our students in our
traditional classrooms. What has been so spectacularly
demonstrated at the Sudbury School is that when students
are given total freedom to choose what they wish to study
they do so with focus, enthusiasm and a level of intensity
that far outstrips the effort traditional students put
into their studies.
In the November/December 2000 issue of Mothering
magazine, Daniel Greenberg, one of the founders of the
Sudbury Valley school writes about Respect, What
Children Get in Democratic Schools. His concluding
remarks give one an insight into how freedom and its
related elements contributes to the maturation of the
Sudbury students.
A university researcher periodically interviewed
Sudbury students over a seven year period. The
researcher noted that although parents often had
reservations about sending a child to a school that
does not "prepare" them for a particular
career goals, those who emerge from Sudbury have
gotten further with these concerns than those who
haven’t learned self reliance . While still in
school, they seem to reach stages of maturity most
people do not achieve until they are graduated from
college. They don’t seem to be plagued by the
feelings of uncertainties, confusion, or despair that
characterize so many people on the verge of assuming
adult responsibilities. They examine their motives and
activities thoroughly and continually, regardless of
what particular thing they are doing, and they are not
afraid of obstacles or failure. (Daniel Greenberg,
Mothering Magazine, no. 103, Nov/Dec 2000.)
The fully self confident self actualized student cannot
properly develop in a classroom where he/she is deprived
of making meaningful decisions about their daily life. We
are not used to thinking about these very important
dimensions of the development of our youth. This goes far
beyond our antiquated focus on traditional curricula. In
settings where teachers have been wise enough to yield
control over many day to day management and circular
decisions to the students many of the self actualization
behaviors begin to emerge. The multiage classroom and the
Sudbury Valley school experiences are two such areas where
one is able to observe students taking charge of their
education and begin to develop their self actualization
skills.
January 2, 2001
Raymond H. Hartjen, 43 Old Fireplace Road, East
Hampton, NY 11937, rhartjen@hamptons.com
Although the following e-mail was received from Janet
Banks after she read my paper on Social IQ many of her
points support the arguments of this paper.
I wanted to get back to you with regard to your
paper. It was very interesting to read, and we are
certainly thinking along the same track regarding the
relationship between social interaction and
intelligence, and how students educated in multi-age
groups are the ones who see the greatest benefits in
this way.
I've just read your paper with interest and couldn't
help think about the work of Alphie Kohn who writes and
speaks a lot about discipline. He and you definitely share
the same belief about social development of children (and
I see that he has a new book out called, "The Case
Against Standardized Testing, Raising the Scores, Ruining
the Schools.") The fact that there was no definition
for "self discipline" in the dictionary is
interesting as many teachers (including myself) have used
this terminology for years; and now, having read your
paper, I am trying to analyze what exactly I mean by that
- and how it is similar and yet different from "self
actualization".
I can now see that when I use the term "self
discipline", I am meaning inner control of emotions,
impulses and behavior - "self governance". This
is a goal that I hope for all my students but "self
actualization" encompasses so much more. Intrinsic
motivation has always been an attribute that I look for
and try to instill in students; but is hopeless when
children are "jumping through hoops". I think
authentic assessment ( when students are required to
reflect on their learning regularly, recognize their
strengths and weaknesses, and set goals) contributes to
"self respect" and as a domino effect, builds
"self improving", "self directing" and
"self reliance". However, it is crucial that
students see this evaluation process as powerful and
important. In today's educational political climate,
teachers need to learn how to do the dance of juggling
accountability and protecting students from a
"strangling control" imposed by bureaucrats.
That means, teachers also need to develop "self
actualization" to work toward positive change in the
educational climate to enable optimal , student centered
learning.
I know that I have mentioned to you before that I have
wanted to document the phenomenon that the oldest students
experience in a multiage setting. Perhaps this is part of
the term, "self actualization". Being placed in
a leadership role certainly impacts on self image and
therefore, on most of the other elements of self
actualization. Perhaps these concepts need to be more
concretely demonstrated to children, as does a multiage
social setting. In other words, learning with the same
"best teaching practices", students cannot
achieve as high a level of "self actualization"
in a single age class as in a multiage class. And because
multiage teachers need to be intricately involved with
creating and integrating curriculum and
assessment/evaluation methods, they are more often
modeling (and enabling) the goals of self actualization
than teachers of single age classes.
How to document these understandings in a convincing
thesis still puzzles me - and intrigues me. Thank you for
once again, causing me to engage in some "serious
ponderings".